References

Segundo ÂRTC, Saraiva S, de Castro C CAD-CAM natural restorations: reproducing nature using a digital workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35:993-1000 https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13028.
Nohl FS, Steele JG, Wassell RW Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: aesthetic control. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:443-450 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801396
Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37:183-193 https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2911
Bakti I, Santosa AS, Irawan B, Damiyanti M Chameleon effect of nano-filled composite resin restorations in artificial acrylic teeth of various shades. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018; 1073 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/5/052011
Rosentritt M, Hartung J, Preis V, Krifka S Influence of placement instruments on handling of dental composite materials. Dent Mater. 2019; 35:e47-e52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.010
Marquardt W, Seiss M, Hickel R, Reichl FX Volatile methacrylates in dental practices. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11:101-107
Sananez A, Sanchez A, Davis L Allergic reaction from dental bonding material through nitrile gloves: clinical case study and glove permeability testing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32:371-379 https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12546
Misra S, Daly B, Dunne S Dentist– patient communication: what do patients and dentists remember following a consultation? Implications for patient compliance. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7:543-549 https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S43255
Keys WF, Keirby N, Ricketts DNJ Provisional restorations – a permanent problem?. Dent Update. 2016; 43:908-914 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2016.43.10.908
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28:215-235
Abbasi M, Moradi Z, Mirzaei M Polymerization shrinkage of five bulk-fill composite resins in comparison with a conventional composite resin. J Dent (Tehran). 2018; 15:365-374
Biradar B, Biradar S, Ms A Evaluation of the effect of water on three different light cured composite restorative materials stored in water: an in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/640942
McCollum BB Function-factors that make mouth and teeth a vital organ. J Am Dent Assoc. 1927; 14
McCollum BB Fundamentals involved in prescribing restorative dental remedies. Dent Items Interest. 1939; 61
Schuyler CH Principles employed in full denture prosthesis which may be applied to other fields of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1929; 16:2045-2054
Biradar B, Biradar S, Ms A Evaluation of the effect of water on three different light cured composite restorative materials stored in water: an in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/640942
Schuyler CH Factors of occlusion applicable to restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1953; 3:772-782 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(53)90146-2
Stuart CE The contributions of gnathology to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 30:607-608
D'Amico A Canine teeth-normal functional relation of the natural teeth of man. J South California Dent Assoc. 1958; 26:6-23
Schuyler CH The function and importance of incisal guidance in oral rehabilitation. 1963. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:219-232 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.118493
Stuart CE, Stallard H Principles involved in restoring occlusion of the natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1960; 10:304-313
Schwartz H Occlusal variations for reconstructing the natural dentition. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55:101-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90084-3
Schuyler CH Freedom in centric. Dent Clin North Am. 1969; 13:681-686
Engelmeier RL Early designs for the occlusal anatomy of posterior denture teeth: part III. J Prosthodont. 2005; 14:131-136 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00001.x
Nyman S, Lindhe J Considerations on the design of occlusion in prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1977; 4:1-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb01878.x
Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, 4th edn. Chicago, IL, USA: Quintessence; 2012
Seligman DA, Pullinger AG The role of functional occlusal relationships in temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Craniomandib Disord. 1991; 5:265-279
Mehta S, Banerji S The application of occlusion in clinical practice part 1: Essential concepts in clinical occlusion. Dent Update. 2018; 45:1003-1015
Dzingutė A, Pileičikienė G, Baltrušaitytė A, Skirbutis G Evaluation of the relationship between the occlusion parameters and symptoms of the temporomandibular joint disorder. Acta Med Litu. 2017; 24:167-175 https://doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v24i3.3551
Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Wilson N Canine guidance on crowned teeth: time for a rethink?. Br Dent J. 2021; 230:285-288 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2699-3
Kaiser DA Fabricating a customized incisal guide table. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45:568-569 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90048-2
Kovacs BO, Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ Aesthetic smile evaluation – a non-invasive solution. Dent Update. 2011; 38:452-458 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.7.452
Dahl BL, Krogstad O, Karlsen K An alternative treatment in cases with advanced localized attrition. J Oral Rehabil. 1975; 2:209-214 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1975.tb00914.x
Poyser NJ, Porter RW, Briggs PF The Dahl concept: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:669-676 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812371
Shillinburg HT, Wilson EL, Morrison JTChicago, IL, USA: Quintessence; 2000
Rieder CE Use of provisional restorations to develop and achieve esthetic expectations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989; 9:122-139
Gough MB, Setchell DJ A retrospective study of 50 treatments using an appliance to produce localised occlusal space by relative axial tooth movement. Br Dent J. 1999; 187:134-139 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800223
Hemmings KW, Darbar UR, Vaughan S Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:287-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70130-2

Anterior aesthetics without dysfunction: a case report. Part 1: the operative dental procedure

From Volume 1, Issue 3, November 2024 | Pages 137-142

Authors

Raj Raja Rayan OBE

MA (ClinEd), MSc, FDSRCS(Ed), FFGDP(UK), MRDRCS(Eng), MGDSRCS(Eng), DRDRCS(Ed), BDS, LDSRCS(Eng), Former Dean, FGDP(UK), RCS (Eng), Former Associate Dean, London Deanery; Recently, Professor and Head of Restorative Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry; Former restorative referral-only practice in Harley Street; Honorary Colonel of The Commonwealth of Kentucky. Now retired.

Articles by Raj Raja Rayan OBE

Abstract

Marketing cosmetic dentistry is financially fashionable. Anterior aesthetic reconstructions are an artform showcasing the dental technician's skill. There is a perceived concern that anterior reconstructions that do not consider the functional features of the mutually protected occlusion, may, in susceptible patients, lead to dysfunction with its possible consequences. This series of three articles examines the restoration of worn upper anterior teeth with a plan for failure.

CPD/Clinical Relevance:

The mutually protected occlusion.

Article

Occlusion is a confusing subject. That is because, historically, occlusal philosophies were invented by well-intentioned, strong personalities and passionate operators promoting complicated and exacting prosthodontic procedures without any evidence based on science. The evolution of its understanding has been by philosophical experimentation, using sophisticated tools and unfortunate patients. Engineering concepts often superseded the physiological ability of such patients, often leading to pathological consequences. Occlusion has developed cult following with fixed ideologies of operating procedures and the potential for overtreatment of patients. Many eminent individuals in the field suffer from cognitive dissonance. If occlusion was the one important feature behind temporomandibular disorders, dentist would have, by now, cured this problem.

Today, the profession has moved away from the dogma of full mouth reconstructions, constructed to centric relation and balanced articulation, to one of the mutually protected occlusion. While the science for this later concept of anterior guidance and posterior stability is sparce, it is nevertheless, the current perceived wisdom. It is based on a biomechanical model that purports to reduce traumatic forces associated with the susceptible clenching parafunctionist.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Aesthetic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free article per month
  • New content available